Final answer:
The statement that symbolism is the literary equivalent of Impressionism is false. These two art movements had different objectives and techniques, with symbolism focusing on abstract ideas through symbols and Impressionism capturing momentary scenes with an emphasis on light. The correct option is b.
Step-by-step explanation:
The assertion that symbolism was the literary equivalent of Impressionism is false. Symbolism was largely a reaction against naturalism and realism, aiming to represent spiritual and fantastical elements rather than physical reality. It focused on representing abstract ideas through symbols, invoking themes of spirituality, the imagination, and dreams.
On the other hand, Impressionism, which also emerged in the late 19th century, sought to capture fleeting moments of light and life, emphasizing the transitory nature of reality as perceived through the senses. It is characterized by loose brushwork and a focus on the changing qualities of light.
While there might be thematic overlaps in terms of moving away from traditional representation, Impressionism and Symbolism had different goals and techniques. Impressionist painters were concerned with capturing moments from modern life and the play of light on surfaces, using a technique that involved quick brush strokes to give an 'impression' of the subject.
Contrastingly, symbolists used symbolic images and indirect suggestion to express complex ideas and states of mind rather than detailed representations.
Hence, Option b is correct.