Final answer:
Josh adhered to a customary employee suspension procedure after suspecting a teller of theft, involving several steps to secure the bank’s assets and operations. Similar situations in a retail setting might provoke an appeal to a higher authority as a defense. Both scenarios highlight the intersection of ethical practices and potential political influences in business decisions.
Step-by-step explanation:
Josh, a bank manager, followed a standard employee suspension procedure when he had suspicions about a teller stealing money. This procedure included talking with his supervisor, placing the employee on leave with pay, suspending their computer account, and taking their prox card and building keys. In scenarios where an employee is accused of theft, such as a cashier with a cash drawer shortage, they might respond by using an appeal to a higher authority, which is one of the techniques where they might justify their actions by claiming a greater 'good'. This can become a political question, especially when decisions made by bank supervisors about financial actions are under scrutiny by bank owners and local politicians, depicting the complex balance between ethical considerations and political pressures in banking and financial institutions.