Final answer:
John Stuart Mill did not approve of government interference even if it appeared to be helping. He valued individual autonomy, feared government abuse of power, and emphasized the efficiency of free markets.
Step-by-step explanation:
John Stuart Mill, a proponent of individual freedom, had reservations about government interference even in cases where the interference could be seen as helping rather than restraining. Three reasons why Mill did not approve of this interference are:
- Respect for individual autonomy: Mill believed that individuals should have the freedom to make choices for themselves, even if those choices are harmful to them. He argued that individuals learn from their mistakes and that restricting their freedom would hinder their personal growth.
- Potential for abuse of government power: Mill was wary of giving too much power to the government, as he believed that they might misuse it or impose their own views on society. He emphasized the importance of open debate and discussion to ensure that all perspectives are considered.
- Market efficiency: Mill believed that free markets are generally more efficient at allocating resources and promoting economic growth. He argued that government interference in the marketplace could lead to unintended consequences and hinder economic progress.