Final answer:
In the given context, 'withdrawn' means to take back or remove support, aligning with 'organized opposition to authority'. It's related to civil disobedience, and historically it's been a way to express disagreement and seek change.
Step-by-step explanation:
Obedience may be withdrawn also from them by their subjects, as their subjects attempted in the recent civil insurrection. In this context, 'withdrawn' means to take back or remove support. It does not refer to a ceremonial procession or parade (option 1), a sudden worsening of symptoms (option 3), or a minor match preceding the main event (option 4). Instead, it aligns most closely with 'organized opposition to authority' (option 2), which suggests an active decision to stop obeying or supporting those in power, potentially due to a lack of trust or disagreement with their actions.
Civil disobedience is a relevant concept here, defined as a public, nonviolent, and political act against the law with the intent to induce change in government policies. The act of withdrawing obedience can be seen as an element of civil disobedience, a refusal to comply with certain laws, demands, or commands of a government or occupying power without resorting to physical violence.
Historically, such actions have sometimes resulted in significant consequences. For instance, those who opposed the ancient Assyrian war machine faced severe punishments meant to discourage further rebellion. Similarly, during times of unrest and civil insurrection, when subjects withdraw their obedience, it symbolizes a collective dissatisfaction and a call for change within the ruling structures.