Final answer:
Soft money tends to exert more influence in elections than hard money due to the lack of regulation and contribution limits. It can be used to support political parties or causes and finance advertisements that indirectly influence election outcomes.
Step-by-step explanation:
- Soft money tends to exert more influence in elections than hard money due to the fact that it is not regulated by the Federal Election Commission and can be used to support political parties or causes instead of individual candidates.
- Soft money typically comes in the form of corporate or union donations and is not subject to the same contribution limits as hard money, which is directly given to a specific candidate's campaign.
- This lack of regulation and contribution limits allows soft money to be used for various purposes, such as financing advertisements that promote certain issues or policies, indirectly influencing the outcome of elections.