Final answer:
The media's role in the Gary Hart scandal of 1987 serves as an example of acting both as a watchdog and paparazzi, focusing on scandal rather than substantive political coverage. The press ideally should scrutinize political figures to ensure transparency and accountability, while connecting the public with important political issues and discussions.
Step-by-step explanation:
When Gary Hart challenged the press in 1987 with the statement that following him around would be boring, only to be involved in a sexual scandal later, this demonstrates the media's role as both a watchdog and paparazzi. In an ideal scenario, the press should act as a watchdog that remains focused on transparency and accountability within democracy rather than sensationalism. This involves scrutinizing political figures and government actions to ensure that they are serving the public interest and adhering to ethical standards.
However, the line between being a watchdog and acting as paparazzi can often blur, which can lead to media coverage that prioritizes scandal and entertainment over informative reporting. The media can play a pivotal role as a linkage institution, connecting the public with the government, and setting the public agenda on what issues should be discussed, which in turn, motivates people to become actively engaged in the community both socially and politically.
Based on these roles, the press should have focused strictly on Hart's professional qualifications and policies instead of his personal life, providing the electorate with the information required to make an informed decision without resorting to sensationalized coverage that diverts attention from substantial political discourse.