148k views
5 votes
The natural disasters and drastic changes in the movie are representations of the actual risks of climate change. What do you think is exaggerated and what is accurate, or could possibly occur? Did the movie change your perspective on global climate change, why or why not?

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

Movies often exaggerate the risks of climate change, though they are based on real concerns such as rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and wildfires.

Step-by-step explanation:

The natural disasters and drastic changes depicted in movies are often exaggerated versions of the risks of climate change. While some aspects, like rising sea levels, stronger storms, and heat waves, are grounded in scientific projections, other scenarios might be sensationalized for dramatic effect.

It's important to differentiate between the dramatized catastrophic events in films and what scientific evidence suggests about future global warming and its impacts.

Rising sea levels are a genuine concern, with the potential to make coastal cities unlivable. Extreme weather events such as hurricanes, heat waves, and wildfires are increasing in frequency and intensity due to anthropogenic climate change.

Although the severity of these events is sometimes overstated in movies, their basis is rooted in observable trends and scientific forecasts.

While climate change is accelerating and represents a serious global challenge, humanity has the potential to adapt over time.

However, the depicted apocalyptic outcomes in movies are generally not an accurate reflection of the expected pace of climate change impacts.

It's crucial for education and policy action to focus on preventing and mitigating adverse weather and natural disasters related to climate change, aiming at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and transitioning to cleaner energy sources.

User Christopher Ellis
by
8.9k points