Csound's defect reporting prioritizes precision and reliability. It ensures no false positives by adopting a conservative approach, underestimating possible behavior, and declaring uncertainty as unsafe.
1) Csound follows a defect reporting strategy where every reported defect is treated as an actual issue (no false positives), and the analysis tends to be conservative, leading to an underapproximation of possible behavior. This means that the reported defects are likely to be genuine, and the system errs on the side of caution, providing a more restrained estimation of potential behaviors.
2) In the case of Csound, the defect reporting strategy involves ensuring that every reported defect is indeed a genuine issue (no false positives). The approach leans towards overapproximating possible behavior, adopting a more cautious stance by considering a broader range of potential issues. This strategy prioritizes avoiding false negatives, emphasizing a comprehensive assessment of possible behaviors to enhance system reliability.
3) Csound's defect reporting strategy focuses on guaranteeing that every reported defect is a true issue (no false negatives). The analysis tends to be conservative, resulting in an underapproximation of possible behavior. This means that the reported defects are likely to be legitimate, and the system takes a cautious approach by providing a more limited estimation of potential behaviors
4) Within the context of Csound, the defect reporting strategy aims to ensure that every reported defect is a genuine issue (no false negatives). The approach is characterized by overapproximating possible behavior, emphasizing caution in cases of uncertainty. This strategy acknowledges the importance of being conservative and prioritizes safety by offering a broader assessment of potential issues, even when in doubt.
Complete question below:
Which of the following statements accurately describes the defect reporting strategy for Csound, emphasizing precision and conservatism in assessing possible behavior?
1) Does Csound aim to ensure that every reported defect is a genuine issue (no false positives), generally providing a conservative analysis that tends to underestimate possible behavior?
2) Does Csound aim to ensure that every reported defect is a genuine issue (no false positives), generally offering an overapproximation of possible behavior to err on the side of caution?
3) Does Csound aim to ensure that every reported defect is a genuine issue (no false negatives), typically providing an analysis that tends to underestimate possible behavior?
4) Does Csound aim to ensure that every reported defect is a genuine issue (no false negatives), generally offering an overapproximation of possible behavior while prioritizing caution in cases of uncertainty?