86.2k views
5 votes
Sexual reproduction provides a mechanism for reducing mutations by only contributing half of an individual's genes, whereas asexually reproducing organisms are stuck with any mutations that occur. True or False?

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The statement about sexual reproduction reducing mutations is false; mutations are essential for variation and can be beneficial. Sexual reproduction does not reduce mutations but can dilute their effects.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement "Sexual reproduction provides a mechanism for reducing mutations by only contributing half of an individual's genes, whereas asexually reproducing organisms are stuck with any mutations that occur" is partially false. While it is true that sexual reproduction involves the combination of genes from two individuals, which can dilute the effect of some harmful mutations, it does not 'reduce mutations' in the strict sense.

In sexual reproduction, mutations can be, in a sense, 'filtered' out over generations, particularly if they are harmful, because individuals with seriously harmful mutations are less likely to reproduce. However, mutations are not reduced purely by the process of contributing only half of the genes. Moreover, mutations are essential for evolution and can sometimes be beneficial, providing genetic variation that contributes to the adaptability and survival of populations.

In contrast, organisms that reproduce asexually can accumulate mutations rapidly because any mutations will be passed directly to their offspring without the chance of being combined with another set of genetic material. Sexual reproduction allows for a reshuffling of genes, which includes the potential for beneficial combinations of mutations that increase survival, as seen through natural selection.

User Aswin P Ashok
by
7.7k points