Final answer:
Freud's psychoanalytic therapy delves into the unconscious mind to resolve conflicts, while Rogers's client-centered approach emphasizes self-healing through a supportive and empathetic therapeutic environment.
Step-by-step explanation:
When comparing and contrasting Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic approach with Carl Rogers's humanistic approach, it is important to consider their divergent views on human nature and the process of counseling. Freud's approach is rooted in the belief that unconscious forces, rooted in childhood, drive human behavior. In contrast, Rogers's client-centered therapy emphasizes the individual's capacity for self-healing and personal growth, with the therapist providing support through unconditional positive regard, genuine interaction, and empathy. Freud's practice was more directive and interpretative, with the therapist seeking to unveil the unconscious content through techniques like dream analysis. On the other hand, Rogers believed in a non-directive approach where clients are seen as having the inherent ability to resolve their psychological disturbances. Rogers centered his methodology on the concept of self, positing that congruence between one's real self and ideal self leads to self-actualization. In summary, Freud's psychoanalytic framework places more emphasis on the therapist's role in interpreting unconscious content, whereas Rogers's client-centered therapy foregrounds the client's role and personal growth facilitated by a supportive therapeutic environment.