Final answer:
Post-meeting is when you would expect to evaluate the meeting process, as it allows for reflection on the effectiveness of the meeting, achievement of goals, and planning for improvements in the future.
Step-by-step explanation:
Evaluating the meeting process is typically expected to occur after the meeting. This stage of evaluation allows participants to reflect on the meeting's effectiveness, discuss what worked well, and identify areas for improvement. It often includes reviewing the goals that were set for the meeting, determining if they were met, and discussing the clarity and effectiveness of the communication during the meeting. Incorporating feedback from this evaluation can help plan for future meetings, ensuring continuous improvement in the meeting process.
During a performance evaluation, individuals often take the opportunity to review work goals and their achievement. This reflection is crucial to setting goals for the next year or work period. Good practice involves not only a look back at the past but also planning for the future. Learning from each meeting and applying it to subsequent ones can help in personal and organizational growth.
In the context of a comprehensive policy process, evaluation is the fourth sequential stage, following agenda setting, policy enactment, and policy implementation. This stage assesses the effectiveness of implemented policies and informs the ongoing development of new policies or revisions to existing ones.