17.4k views
0 votes
Is the following a valid syllogistic argument? Identify its major and minor premise.

1. Statement: All cars have engines.
2. Statement: A Corvette is a car.
3. Conclusion: A Corvette has an engine

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The argument presented is a valid syllogistic argument with a structure known as modus ponens, which guarantees that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.

Step-by-step explanation:

The student's question involves evaluating the validity of a syllogistic argument. A syllogistic argument is one that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two or more premises that are asserted or assumed to be true. In this case, the argument follows a valid form known as a modus ponens, which is a common and valid deductive argument structure.

The two premises in question are:

  1. All cars have engines. (Major Premise)
  2. A Corvette is a car. (Minor Premise)

Then the conclusion drawn from these premises is:

A Corvette has an engine. (Conclusion)

This argument's structure ensures that, if both premises are true, the conclusion must necessarily be true. Thus, the argument is valid.

User Alex Yu
by
8.8k points