Final answer:
The second tactical goal in the Investigate Dimension is to determine the significance of the collected evidence in relation to the event being investigated. This involves critical analysis and interpretation to uncover deeper insights and ensure the evaluation is well-founded. Relevant evidence gathering and problem-solving methods contribute to achieving this goal.
Step-by-step explanation:
The second tactical goal in the Investigate Dimension is to determine what the items and evidence mean. This goal involves a critical analysis of the collected items and information to understand their significance in relation to the event being investigated. It's essential to not just collect evidence, but also to interpret it, recognizing patterns or inconsistencies that may provide deeper insight into the situation at hand. For instance, in the context of a written argument, one might need to re-read the text several times, annotating or highlighting key evidence, to ensure a thorough understanding. In other scenarios such as evaluating a film or an employee's performance, repeated observations focusing on specific evaluation criteria can be crucial for gathering substantial evidence.
Gathering enough relevant evidence is better than basing an evaluation on insufficient data. By doing this, the investigator or reviewer can avoid premature judgments and ensure that their final assessment is well-substantiated. Problem-solving strategies also align well with this goal by emphasizing the identification of 'given' information and determining what is required to 'find' a solution or understand the situation.