105k views
3 votes
An exposure was made using 600 mA, 0.04-s exposure, and 85 kVp. Each of the following changes will serve to decrease the radiographic density by one-half except change to

1. 1/50-s exposure 2. 72 kVp 3 18 mAs
4. 300 mA
Answer: 18 mAs

User Laynor
by
7.0k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The question pertains to the Physics of radiographic density in medical imaging, specifically the effects of changing radiographic parameters on image density at the College level.

Step-by-step explanation:

The subject of the question is Physics, specifically focusing on the principles of radiation in medical imaging and the concept of radiographic density. The question asked is at a College level, as it requires an understanding of x-ray machine settings such as milliamperage (mA), exposure time in seconds (s), kilovolt peak (kVp), and milliampere-seconds (mAs) which are critical for radiography students or professionals.

The original question asks for which change would not decrease the radiographic density by one-half among the provided options. It involves calculating the effect of altering exposure factors on radiographic density, which is crucial for producing optimal x-ray images and ensuring patient safety. Radiographic density is influenced by the amount of x-ray photons that reach the image receptor; changing the mA, exposure time, kVp, or mAs can modify this density.

When considering the impact of the factors on radiographic density, it is essential to remember that density is directly proportional to the product of mA and exposure time (which gives us mAs), and to the square of the kVp. A reduction by half in mAs or an appropriate reduction in kVp can achieve a half reduction in radiographic density. However, the 18 mAs does not represent a halving of the mAs from the original conditions. The original exposure was made with 600 mA at 0.04 seconds, which is 24 mAs (600mA * 0.04s = 24mAs). Therefore, changing to 18 mAs would actually decrease the radiographic density, but not by half.

User Sumit Patel
by
8.6k points