Final answer:
Without specific context, it's difficult to identify which bombing and subsequent reaction is being referred to. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., known for responding with nonviolence, has historically urged calm after violent incidents, such as the bombing of his home. Key historical reactions to bombing events range from national shock and bipartisan responses, such as the Oklahoma City Bombing, to strategic military decisions like those during World War II's end.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question appears to refer to a reaction following a specific bombing incident; however, without explicit context, it is difficult to determine which event this refers to. If we are talking about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s reaction to a bombing, it is known that he usually responded with a call for nonviolence and peace. For example, after the bombing of his home, King urged restraint and calm to his supporters. In the broader context of bombings during World War II, leaders of nations reacted in various ways, either by bolstering their defense systems or by engaging in diplomatic efforts. President Kennedy's response to the Cuban Missile Crisis was measured and aimed at avoiding direct military confrontation, even though his military advisors suggested an invasion.
When discussing the Oklahoma City Bombing, the immediate reaction was one of shock and grief, followed by a nationwide effort to assist victims and a bipartisan push to increase funding for antiterrorism programs. In contrast, the decision to use atomic bombs on Japan during World War II was a military one, with the intent of forcing a Japanese surrender and avoiding further heavy casualties that could result from an invasion of Japan. The continued bombing of Japanese cities even after the use of atomic bombs shows the strategic thinking of that time, which prioritized achieving surrender over the morality of the bombings.