Final Answer:
The correct answer is C. no, because energy is not conserved.
Step-by-step explanation:
The situation described violates the principle of conservation of energy. In an elastic collision, both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved. However, in the scenario depicted, the small ball at rest gains kinetic energy after the collision, which is not possible if only elastic collisions are considered. The correct choice is C, as the violation of energy conservation is the primary reason why this situation is not possible.
In an elastic collision between two objects with masses
and
and velocities
and
before the collision and
and
after the collision, both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved. The conservation of momentum is expressed as
), and the conservation of kinetic energy is expressed as
.
In the given situation, since the small ball is initially at rest
, the kinetic energy before the collision is solely due to the moving ball with twice the mass. After the collision, the small ball gains kinetic energy, which violates the conservation of energy in an elastic collision. Therefore, the correct conclusion is that the situation is not possible due to the non-conservation of energy (Option C).