Final answer:
The Commander's inquiry is confined to issues within their area of responsibility, such as investigating conduct, incidents, or personnel performance. It relates to military strategy, leadership, and the role of a commander in predicting outcomes and making informed decisions. The Judicial Branch's purposes involve interpreting law and ensuring rights.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Commander's inquiry referenced in 'Para 1-11' is likely related to legal or organizational procedures within a military or governmental context. The specific matters that a Commander's inquiry would be confined to typically involve issues within their command or areas of responsibility. Such matters could include investigating alleged misconduct, assessing operational incidents, or evaluating the performance of duties by personnel under their command. It is crucial for a commander to understand the limits of their inquiry to maintain legal and professional standards.
The broader context of this question appears to relate to military strategy and leadership, considering the references to strategic considerations such as advantages derived from 'Heaven and Earth,' discipline enforcement, army strength, training levels, and constancy in rewards and punishments as outlined in the provided references. In a historical or strategic inquiry, these considerations could be used to predict victory or defeat, highlight the importance of leadership, and stress the need for flexibility in response to changing circumstances.
Regarding the Judicial Branch outlined in Article III, the purposes include interpreting the law, resolving legal disputes, and upholding the Constitution, which comprises addressing personal, political, and economic rights guaranteed to citizens. These inquiries demonstrate the multifaceted responsibilities of command and judicial positions in different sectors, emphasizing the importance of informed decision-making.