Final answer:
The term 'Mother of Christ' is less accurate according to John of Damascus, as Christian tradition prefers 'Mother of God' to acknowledge Christ's divine nature. Thus, the statement is considered false.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to historical Christian theology, as presented by figures such as John of Damascus, Mary is indeed referred to as the "Mother of God" (Theotokos), due to her role in giving birth to Jesus Christ, who is recognized as both fully human and fully divine. The term Mother of Christ underplays her significance, as it does not acknowledge Christ's divine nature. Therefore, in the context of traditional Christian theology, as reflected in the worship and iconography of the time, it is typically considered more accurate to call Mary the Mother of God rather than merely the "Mother of Christ". This is in line with the doctrine of the Hypostatic Union, which suggests that Jesus is one person in two natures: divine and human. Hence, the statement 'According to John of Damascus, should we call Mary the "Mother of Christ"?' would be considered false as it contradicts the fuller title given to her as "Mother of God" to acknowledge the dual nature of Jesus Christ.