Final Answer:
The type of consent that would likely be a liability when dealing with a minor athlete is Implied consent. Thus the correct option is 2) Implied consent.
Step-by-step explanation:
Implied consent refers to a situation where consent is assumed based on the actions or behaviors of the individual rather than explicitly given. In the case of a minor athlete, relying solely on implied consent might lead to misunderstandings or legal issues, especially considering the individual's age and potential inability to fully understand the implications of their actions. While implied consent can be appropriate in certain situations where it's reasonably assumed the individual understands and agrees, it might not provide sufficient legal protection when dealing with minors due to their inability to provide informed consent.
When working with minor athletes, it's crucial to prioritize obtaining parental consent or informed consent depending on the specific circumstances. Parental consent ensures that the legal guardians or parents have acknowledged and agreed to the athlete's participation, thus offering a higher level of protection against liabilities.
Informed consent involves educating both the minor and their legal guardians about the risks, benefits, and expectations involved in the athletic activities, ensuring that they fully understand and agree to the terms before participation. This level of transparency minimizes the risk of legal liabilities and protects the well-being of the minor athlete. Therefore, relying solely on implied consent with a minor athlete can pose potential liabilities and is generally not advisable in such situations.Thus the correct option is 2) Implied consent.