207k views
3 votes
Which of the following is the best approach to mitigate alignment risk?

Multiple Choice
Assure top management support.
Conduct training and provide incentives.
Use the balanced scorecard framework.
Use sensitivity analysis.

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The best approach to mitigate alignment risk is to use the balanced scorecard framework, assure top management support, and conduct sensitivity analysis.

Step-by-step explanation:

Alignment risk refers to the potential for misalignment between different organizational objectives or strategies. To mitigate alignment risk, one of the best approaches is to use the balanced scorecard framework.

The balanced scorecard provides a comprehensive and balanced view of an organization's performance by considering multiple perspectives, such as financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth.

By using the balanced scorecard framework, organizations can ensure that their strategies and objectives are aligned across different areas.

This alignment helps mitigate the risk of pursuing conflicting goals or strategies that could lead to inefficiencies or ineffective decision-making.

In addition to using the balanced scorecard, it is also important to assure top management support. When top management provides clear direction and support for organizational objectives, it helps ensure alignment throughout the organization. Top management support can also help overcome barriers and resistance to change.

Lastly, sensitivity analysis can be used to identify and understand the potential impact of changes and uncertainties on the alignment of objectives.

Sensitivity analysis allows organizations to assess how different factors, such as market conditions or resource constraints, may affect the achievement of objectives, helping them make more informed decisions and adjust their strategies accordingly.

User Leap Bun
by
8.4k points