Final answer:
The inquiry about establishing facts without external records on page 35 of George Orwell's '1984' is an English Literature question which delves into the role of memory in discerning reality. It is explored through different literary works and philosophical perspectives, recognizing the fallibility of memory and the influence of power on perceived truths.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question posed on page 35 of George Orwell's '1984' reflects on the theme of memory and reality, particularly how own memory serves as a record for facts in the absence of external documentation. The novel is indicative of broader discussions on how society and those in power can manipulate or control historical records, thereby impacting an individual's understanding of reality. This connects with the idea presented by Ralph Ellison in 'Invisible Man,' where the protagonist fights for recognition in a society indifferent to his existence, and Virginia Woolf's technique of blurring internal consciousness and speech, illustrating the challenge of distinguishing between one's thoughts, memories, and reality. The unreliability of memory is a critical point; philosophers distinguish between the certainty of true memory and the dubiousness of seeming to remember. Recalling the old fable 'The Man and the Lion,' it could be suggested that history and reality might be distorted by who wields the power to write it. Similarly, John F. Kennedy points out that myths, which are persistent and persuasive, can sometimes pose a greater threat to the truth than deliberate lies. The collective idea from these different sources and philosophical views suggests that without the corroboration of collective memory or an impartial record, establishing 'the most obvious fact' can be questionable.