Final Answer:
The correct corrective action is to replace the cracked insulator, which corresponds to option 2.
Step-by-step explanation:
In Figure 2-15, view B, the identification of a cracked vibration insulator prompts the need for a precise corrective measure. The decision to replace the cracked insulator (option 2) is based on both economic and functional considerations. Replacing the entire shock mount assembly (option 1) might be an overzealous response, as the damage appears localized to one insulator. Opting for a comprehensive replacement of all vibration insulators (option 3) may incur unnecessary costs if the other insulators are structurally sound.
In aircraft maintenance, precision is paramount. Replacing the cracked insulator ensures the restoration of optimal vibration damping without incurring excessive expenses. Additionally, it minimizes downtime, aligning with the efficiency and safety standards crucial in aviation. The decision is rooted in a balanced approach, addressing the specific issue without overhauling components that remain serviceable.
Considering the operational and financial aspects, replacing the cracked insulator strikes a judicious balance between corrective action and resource utilization. This approach aligns with the principles of targeted maintenance, promoting both safety and cost-effectiveness in aircraft maintenance practices.