Final answer:
The terms listed relate to constitutional rights, such as the exclusionary rule and prior restraint, rather than anti-concurrent causation language found in insurance policies.
Step-by-step explanation:
The phrase 'anti-concurrent causation language' typically refers to a provision found in insurance policies that excludes coverage for losses caused by a combination of covered and excluded perils. However, the first 8 exclusions you mentioned seem to relate to constitutional rights and legal principles rather than insurance language. These terms include:
- Exclusionary rule
- No cruel and unusual punishment
- Right to petition government
- Right to counsel (felony cases)
- Immunity from self-incrimination
- Right to confront witnesses
- Right to privacy
- Prior restraint
These are important concepts in constitutional law and civil liberties rather than insurance exclusions. For instance, the exclusionary rule is a legal principle that excludes evidence obtained in violation of an individual's constitutional rights from being used in a court of law. The term 'prior restraint' pertains to a constitutional doctrine that prevents the government from prohibiting speech or publication before the fact, which could be relevant in First Amendment issues.