Final answer:
Interdisciplinarians face challenges in achieving clear integration and consensus on its results, highlighted by works of scholars like Edmund Russell and forums such as MEDMED-L. The success varies in educational applications and subjective processes, but examples in ecology and collaborations between sociologists and psychologists show ongoing efforts and some successes in interdisciplinary work.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is true that interdisciplinarians have often faced challenges in achieving integration and have been even less clear about the results of such integration. Interdisciplinary work requires navigating through different terminologies, norms, and occasionally conflicting evidence. Scholars like Edmund Russell and forums such as the Medieval Medicine listserve (MEDMED-L) offer methodologies and discussions to help bridge these gaps, although the application at the basic educational levels may still lack broad employability. Moreover, the highly subjective nature of some interdisciplinary processes and the lack of consensus on the success of certain practices, such as homeschooling, highlight the complexity of achieving a unified approach.
Examples of the necessity for integration include the fields of ecology, anthropology, and the collaboration between sociologists and psychologists. Each blends various scientific disciplines to expand knowledge and embraces confusion as a source of strength, as noted by scholar Clifford Geertz. This indicates that while the challenges of integration are real, they are also a fundamental part of the process of advancing comprehensive understanding across different fields.