Final answer:
Generalists typically embrace an interdisciplinary approach, integrating various explanations, theories, and meanings from different disciplines to understand complex issues, which is in opposition to the statement that they avoid integrative explanations to prevent confusion.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is false that generalists prefer to present a menu of competing disciplinary explanations, theories, and meanings rather than one integrative explanation, theory, or meaning to avoid adding more explanations that will result in confusion. In fact, generalists often draw from a broad array of disciplines to understand phenomena in a holistic manner. This interdisciplinary approach is inherent in the nature of generalists, who thrive on the synthesis of knowledge from different fields to comprehend complex issues. For example, while philosophers aim to understand how things hang together in the broadest sense, they often have to contend with competing explanations, each backed by its own logic and evidence. Likewise, the field of anthropology embraces a diversity of thought as its strength, suggesting that embracing multiple perspectives can lead to deeper understanding.