Final answer:
The Romans accepted one man rule for stability in times of crisis, belief in the divine right of kings, and to maintain stability and order.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Romans accepted one man rule for various reasons. One reason was the need for stability in times of crisis. When Rome faced a major crisis, the Centuriate Assembly could vote to appoint a dictator, a single man vested with full power to save Rome. While the office of dictator could have led to abuse of power, most dictators respected the temporary nature of their rule and returned power to normal after the crisis.
Another reason for accepting one man rule was the belief in the divine right of kings. In the early centuries of Rome, the city was ruled by kings. This period of monarchical rule was established by Romulus, the founder of Rome. Although the Romans rebelled against the last king and established the Republic, the idea of a powerful leader with authority from the gods still held some appeal to them.
Lastly, the Romans valued stability and order. They prided themselves on military dominance, patriotism, and respect for authority. One man rule provided a centralized power structure that could maintain law and order. The Romans viewed it as necessary to prevent chaos and ensure the empire's survival.