Final answer:
Conflict signals to the ego in a psychological and negotiation context that there's a need to address underlying issues and balance desires and morals to resolve conflict and reach an agreement.
Step-by-step explanation:
Conflict signals to ego (the executive negotiator) that there are underlying issues or challenges that need to be acknowledged and addressed.
In psychological terms, the ego acts as a mediator between the individual's base desires represented by the id and the moral standards of the superego, seeking a balance in the face of internal or external strife.
Similarly, in the context of political bargaining and negotiations, conflict signals that the parties involved need to find common ground or make concessions to reach an agreement. This is especially tricky in situations where the parties have opposed goals or there are high transaction and conformity costs.
However, these conflicts can also lead to positive outcomes, such as the expression of empathy, acknowledgment of past sufferings, and the halt of destructive behaviors, leading towards reconciliation.