Final answer:
The debate over a judge's courtroom demeanor touches on whether they can actively engage with the case by clarifying their opinions through questions or if they should remain impartial and not indicate any bias before giving a decision.
Step-by-step explanation:
The proper conduct of a judge in court, especially in terms of managing personal impressions and biases, raises nuanced questions within legal practice. Judges known for being keen and quick argue that they cannot fully examine and understand the case at hand unless they actively engage through questioning and interruptions, thereby occasionally revealing their own opinions. By contrast, judges who value calmness and dignity maintain that a judge should not display their inclinations while the case is being argued, as it may give an unfair indication of the eventual ruling. Ultimately, this debate touches upon the balance required in maintaining judicial impartiality and the effectiveness of the legal process.