Final answer:
The counterculture movement of the 1960s can be considered a popular goal that can do without the virtue it refuses to recognize. While it challenged and rejected mainstream values, it often overlooked traditional virtues, limiting its impact.
Step-by-step explanation:
The counterculture emerged during the 1960s as a response to the prevailing social, political, and cultural norms of the time. Its goal was to challenge and reject mainstream values, embrace alternative lifestyles, and promote social change. However, the counterculture movement often rejected traditional virtues and norms, such as respect for authority, societal conventions, and moral values. While the counterculture succeeded in raising awareness about important issues like civil rights, gender equality, and environmentalism, its rejection of certain virtues limited its ability to effectuate lasting change. For example, the counterculture movement advocated for freedom of expression and individualism but often disregarded the virtues of responsibility and accountability. This lack of recognition and practice of virtues often led to excesses, such as drug abuse and violence, as mentioned in the provided information about cultural icons like Jimi Hendrix and Janis Joplin dying of drug overdoses in 1970.