Final answer:
a) The 'sunk' costs in this situation are the initial payment of $5000 for the lease and the rent of $5000 per annum. The 'opportunity' cost is the potential rent of $550 per month if Mrs. Johnston sublets the shop instead.
b) Mrs. Johnston should continue with her plans to use the shop for the sale of clothing as it would result in higher profitability.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The 'sunk' costs in this situation are the initial payment of $5000 for the lease and the rent of $5000 per annum. These costs are already paid and cannot be recovered if the lease is cancelled. The 'opportunity' cost in this situation is the potential rent of $550 per month that Mrs. Johnston could receive if she sublets the shop to a friend instead of using it herself.
b) Mrs. Johnston's financial situation can be detailed as follows:
-
- Sales: $115,000
-
- Less VAT: $15,000
-
- Sales less VAT: $100,000
-
- Cost of Goods Sold: $50,000
-
- Wages and Wage-Related Costs: $12,000
-
- Total Rent (including down payment): $10,000
-
- Rates, Heating, Lighting, and Insurance: $13,000
-
- Audit, Legal, and General Expenses: $2,000
-
- Total Costs: $87,000
-
- New Profit Before Tax: $13,000
Given this information, Mrs. Johnston will have a new profit before tax of $13,000 if she operates the business. However, if she decides to sublet the shop for a monthly rent of $550, she would forfeit the down payment (sunk cost), but generate a different stream of income without the operational hassle. To support her decision, she would need to compare the new profit before tax to the total opportunity cost of not subletting, which is $6,600 annually ($550 x 12).
Based on the financial information provided, Mrs. Johnston's decision to operate the clothing store yields a higher profit ($13,000) than the potential rental income from subletting ($6,600). Therefore, the financially justified decision would be to continue with her plans to operate the clothing store.