Final answer:
When a client lacks a third-party tracker, recommending the use of a neutral third-party is beneficial for unbiased oversight and transparency.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a client does not have access to a third-party tracker, it is advisable to consider alternative means of tracking to ensure the necessary oversight and transparency. If an informal approach has not yielded the desired results and no internal mechanism is available to track the required information, the involvement of a neutral third-party can be beneficial. This external entity can provide an unbiased perspective and may assist in monitoring, verifying, or resolving the matter at hand in a fair and credible manner.