Final answer:
Stock characters or stereotypes in a film are archetypes lacking depth, based on clichés, and often reflect societal biases. They can contribute to stigmatization and systemic discrimination. These static or flat characters are simplistic and do not capture the complexities of individuals or their experiences.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a film reduces an otherwise realistic character to a set of static traits that identify him or her in terms of a social, physical, or cultural category, it often relies on the use of stock characters or stereotypes. These characters are typically archetypes that are immediately recognizable to audiences due to their universality. Stock characters like the villain, the servant, or the overprotective mother lack psychological depth and are often based on stereotypes and cliché. As caricatures, they can be easily and quickly summarized.
The process of simplifying a character to static attributes can lead to the stigmatization of certain groups. Films that consistently portray individuals from minority or marginalized communities with negative or limiting characteristics contribute to a narrow and often inaccurate representation. This stereotyping can bolster systemic issues such as racism or discrimination in the film industry and beyond.
In the context of storytelling and character development, when certain characters remain static and do not evolve, they can serve as a reference to underscore the growth of dynamic characters. However, a flattened character represents a set of values or ideas, typically void of a unique personal history or development. This simplification can also lead to a lack of appreciation for the diverse circumstances individuals face, further entrenching stereotypes and societal biases.