Final answer:
The statement describes Kant's transcendental idealism, where minds have innate categories shaping our experiences, with these categories not derived from experience but necessary for making sense of the world.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement you've provided is a description of Immanuel Kant's transcendental idealism. According to Kant, our minds possess innate categories of understanding that actively shape and constitute our experiences, rather than these categories being a result of the experience itself. These categories are a priori, meaning they are present before any experience, and are necessary for us to process and make sense of the world.
For Kant, there are two sources that contribute to our knowledge: the mind's receptive capacity to sensations (sensibility) and the mind's conceptual capacity (understanding). These faculties work together to allow us to have experiences that are structured in time and space. However, because we are bound by these innate categories within our mind-brain structure, we can never know objects as they are in themselves, but only as they appear to us through the framework of our senses and mind.
To further elaborate, Kant differentiated between two types of statements: analytic and synthetic. Analytic statements are those that are true by definition (analytic a priori), while synthetic statements are those that add new information to the subject (synthetic a priori). According to Kant, the categories of the understanding are synthetic a priori, as they are informative yet not derived from experience.