Final answer:
According to Churchland, 'mind' is not a substance with independent ontological status. Churchland rejects substance dualism and instead advocates for a monist view of the mind, which means that there is only one kind of substance, usually physical or material.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to Churchland, 'mind' is not a substance with independent ontological status. Churchland rejects substance dualism and instead advocates for a monist view of the mind, which means that there is only one kind of substance, usually physical or material. He argues that mental states and processes can be fully explained by brain activity and neural processes. Therefore, the statement 'mind is a kind of substance that has independent ontological status' is false according to Churchland's perspective.