Final answer:
When a prospective client does not allow a predecessor auditor to respond, the successor auditor should evaluate the reason for refusal, consider the associated risks, and possibly decline the engagement if necessary.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a prospective client refuses to permit the predecessor auditor to respond, the successor auditor should carefully consider the implications of this refusal on the engagement. According to professional standards, such a refusal can be a sign of potential problems or disputes between the client and the predecessor auditor. The successor auditor should take additional steps to assess the risks associated with accepting the engagement. This includes understanding the reasons behind the refusal and whether it might be indicative of issues such as disagreements over accounting principles, disputes concerning auditing procedures, or possible management integrity issues.
Communication between predecessor and successor auditors is considered necessary due diligence in an audit engagement transition. If the client does not allow this communication, the successor auditor must evaluate the reasons for the refusal and attempt to gather information through other avenues, if possible. This might include discussions with other parties who are knowledgeable about the company's finances and operations, such as its legal counsel, bankers, or regulators.
The successor auditor should also consider discussing the matter with the client to clarify any concerns or misunderstandings. If the refusal continues and the successor auditor feels that it limits their ability to perform a proper audit, they may have no choice but to decline the engagement. It is important for the successor auditor to document their inquiries, the client's refusal, and the reasons for the decision made regarding acceptance or continuation of the audit engagement.