Final answer:
Learning theorists would likely see Becky's act of returning the purse as a result of conditioning and reinforcement from past experiences. Sociologically, a functionalist would view her actions as affirming social order, a conflict theorist would reflect on it in terms of class and property, and a symbolic interactionist would focus on the meanings and symbols associated with her behavior.
Step-by-step explanation:
Learning theorists, when discussing Becky's actions, would likely focus on behavioral concepts such as conditioning and reinforcement. They would assert that Becky's behavior could have been influenced by a history of learned experiences and rewards associated with doing the right thing. For instance, if Becky received positive reinforcement when she performed honest deeds, it might have strengthened her tendency to act honestly in the situation with the found purse.
From the sociological perspective, each would view her actions differently. A functionalist might see her behavior as a contribution to social stability, reinforcing norms and values that encourage trust and cooperation in the community. A conflict theorist, on the other hand, might interpret her action as a challenge to the class structure by not taking advantage of the situation for personal gain which could reflect on broader societal issues related to property and morality. Lastly, a symbolic interactionist would be interested in the symbols involved in her action, such as what the purse represents (someone's property, trust, etc.) and how her decision to return it reflects the social interactions and meanings Becky has learned and ascribes to the act of finding lost items.