Final Answer:
c) Properties originally recorded in the Land Court system remain in that system, so both it and the regular system are maintained.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hawaii's continued use of the Land Court system is primarily rooted in the historical recording of properties. Properties that were originally recorded in the Land Court system remain within that system, creating a parallel system alongside the regular one. This dual existence serves to preserve the historical aspects of land registration in the state.
The Land Court system was established to provide a more efficient and conclusive method for registering land titles, especially in cases where title disputes or questions about ownership arose. As a result, the state maintains both systems to accommodate properties that have undergone Land Court registration and those that have followed the traditional route.
In addition to historical preservation, this dual-system approach ensures clarity and specificity in the registration process. Agricultural and rural properties, which may have unique characteristics and considerations, can only be conveyed through the Land Court system (Option a). Moreover, leasehold properties, which involve the leasing of land for a specific period, must also be registered in the Land Court system (Option b). This pragmatic differentiation helps streamline the registration process for properties with distinct features, contributing to the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the state's land registration system. In essence, the coexistence of both Land Court and regular systems caters to the diverse nature of property transactions and aligns with Hawaii's historical context of land registration.