60.5k views
5 votes
Subject to the Solvency II standards. Company managers believed the company was adequately financed, however it was determined that the company did not have adequate assets based on the uncertainty of its operating performance. The standard that Be-Ne-Lux failed to meet is

a.Own risk and solvency assessment
b.Underwriting leverage
c.Risk-based capital
d.Basel II

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The standard Be-Ne-Lux failed to meet as per the Solvency II directive is the own risk and solvency assessment. This assessment is crucial for maintaining the financial stability of insurance companies within the EU and involves evaluating the adequacy of assets relative to liabilities and capital. This contrasts with Basel II, which is associated with banking regulation and focuses on three pillars: minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline.

Step-by-step explanation:

The student's question refers to a failure to meet certain financial health standards as per the Solvency II regulations. The correct standard that Be-Ne-Lux failed to meet based on the provided scenario is its own risk and solvency assessment (ORSA). ORSA is a key component of the Solvency II Directive, which is a regulatory framework for insurance firms within the European Union that mandates these organizations to maintain sufficient assets relative to their insurance liabilities and capital to ensure solvency and adequate financial stability.

In assessing a company's financial health under Solvency II, supervisors consider several factors, including the value of the company's assets and the riskiness of its operations. The value of a bank's assets, predominantly its loans, must be enough to cover potential losses from non-repayment. This valuation is complex and must account for factors like loan defaults and the riskiness inherent in loan portfolios. Financial health is also assessed by examining risk-based capital, which requires banks to hold a minimum amount of capital about their risk profiles to absorb financial shocks.

In contrast, Basel II is more closely associated with banking regulations rather than insurance companies, focusing on three main areas: minimum capital requirements, supervisory review, and market discipline. It aims to create international standards that banking regulators can use to control how much capital banks need to put aside to guard against financial and operational risks.

Moreover, proper corporate governance, such as executive compensation policies and oversight by the Board of Directors, plays a vital role in maintaining the financial stability of financial institutions. The Lehman Brothers collapse exemplifies how inadequate corporate governance can lead to excessive risk-taking, ultimately resulting in financial distress.

The assessment of a financial institution's stability under Solvency II and its preparedness for potential losses due to risky assets and loan defaults are critical to the integrity and health of the global financial system.

User Tospo
by
8.6k points