Final answer:
The question likely pertains to research into primate cognition and communication, especially in terms of animacy and humanity. It refers to comparative studies between nonhuman primates and humans to investigate neurobiological responses to stimuli representing animate versus inanimate objects. Though not specifically about Kanwisher, the general methodology could be inferred from the context provided.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question relates to the study of nonhuman primates and their cognitive and communicative capabilities as compared to humans. Dr. Nancy Kanwisher's work is not explicitly mentioned, rather it is primatologist Sue Savage-Rumbaugh's groundbreaking work with bonobos, specifically Kanzi and Panbanisha, which demonstrates significant cognitive linguistic abilities.
These bonobos were part of studies that showcased their capacity to understand and respond to human speech as well as their ability to use a lexigram-based computer program to communicate. To test the alternative hypotheses around Animacy/humanity, Kanwisher's work would likely involve experimental approaches similar to those used in biological anthropology, comparing neurobiological responses of nonhuman primates and humans to various stimuli that represent animate versus inanimate objects or entities, determining if particular areas of the brain are preferentially activated when perceiving beings with animacy or humanity.