Final answer:
A state after normal execution can no longer proceed is often referred to as a failed or fragile state, which is unable to perform essential functions like maintaining order and providing services. Failed states have almost completely collapsed, whereas fragile states struggle with resilience. Historical examples include colonial states and contemporary issues in legal or governmental proceedings.
Step-by-step explanation:
The state after the discovery that normal execution can no longer proceed often refers to situations where a government or state is unable to perform its vital functions. Such scenarios can take place in failed states, where there is a loss of control over the territory, inability to provide public services, and the breakdown of law and order. The concept also relates to fragile states, which possess weak systems that are insufficient to manage aspects of society and the economy effectively.
Failed state is a severe condition where the lack of governance capacity is so pronounced that there is an almost complete collapse in the state's sovereignty. The state becomes incapable of interacting as a member of the international community or protecting its citizens against external threats and internal chaos. Various factors, such as internal conflict, corruption, and extreme poverty, may contribute to a state's failure. On the other hand, a fragile state might be able to perform some governing functions but lacks the steadiness or resilience to withstand economic or political challenges.
Examples of state failure or fragility can be seen historically in colonial states, where foreign-imposed governments were unable to sustain the essential functions of governance for the local populations. In more contemporary terms, trials that get halted due to the inability to proceed, as mentioned in the provided reference material, are a microcosmic reflection of the broader systemic failures that occur when key state institutions lack the capacity to function correctly.