Final answer:
The Framers held varying views on human nature, with some seeing it as bad and others, like John Locke, viewing it as inherently good and rational. Their beliefs were shaped by different philosophical perspectives and the practical needs of forming a government.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Framers' beliefs about human nature were complex and varied, incorporating differing views on the matter. Some had a more pessimistic view, like many conservatives of the time, who believed human nature was essentially bad, evil, and depraved, requiring strong governance to keep these traits in check. This view was famously espoused by conservative figures like Joseph de Maistre.
On the other hand, philosophers like John Locke had a more optimistic view, seeing humans as inherently good, rational, and peaceful. According to Locke, humans are born with certain natural rights and freedoms and are capable of self-government through reason and a social contract designed to safeguard their rights and freedoms.
It's important to note that the Framers were not a homogeneous group, and their views were shaped by a range of philosophical influences as well as pragmatic considerations during the crafting of the U.S. Constitution.