Question

Large lot zoning has evoked an unfavorable response from some state courts because

a. the additional costs for infrastructure are not justified.
b. the hidden motivation of the zoning law is to integrate the community.
c. it results in development that excludes the financially disadvantaged.
d. it tends to increase school taxes

Answer 1

State courts often view large lot zoning unfavorably because it can lead to socio-economic exclusion, making it difficult for lower-income individuals to live in certain areas. This practice raises concerns about the equity of land use and the distribution of external costs of suburban expansion.

Step-by-step explanation:

Large lot zoning has elicited adverse reactions from some state courts primarily because it leads to patterns of development that may exclude the financially disadvantaged. Zoning that results in requiring large lots can be seen as a tool for socio-economic segregation by making it unaffordable for lower-income individuals to reside within certain communities. This is an unfavorable outcome as it goes against the goals of equitable land use and may challenge the fairness and legality of such zoning laws.

Zoning ordinances are meant to serve the public good, but when they result in exclusionary practices, their justification is put into question. The expansion of suburbs at the expense of taxpayers, including those residing in inner cities, further compounds the issue, representing an external cost that is unfairly distributed. These dynamics underscore the complexity of zoning and its implications for urban development and social equity.

Answer 2

State courts often view large lot zoning unfavorably because it can lead to socio-economic exclusion, making it difficult for lower-income individuals to live in certain areas. This practice raises concerns about the equity of land use and the distribution of external costs of suburban expansion.

Step-by-step explanation:

Large lot zoning has elicited adverse reactions from some state courts primarily because it leads to patterns of development that may exclude the financially disadvantaged. Zoning that results in requiring large lots can be seen as a tool for socio-economic segregation by making it unaffordable for lower-income individuals to reside within certain communities. This is an unfavorable outcome as it goes against the goals of equitable land use and may challenge the fairness and legality of such zoning laws.

Zoning ordinances are meant to serve the public good, but when they result in exclusionary practices, their justification is put into question. The expansion of suburbs at the expense of taxpayers, including those residing in inner cities, further compounds the issue, representing an external cost that is unfairly distributed. These dynamics underscore the complexity of zoning and its implications for urban development and social equity.