Final answer:
Fallacies of emotional arguments are problematic because they rely on appealing to the emotions of the audience rather than presenting relevant evidence or logical reasoning.
Step-by-step explanation:
Fallacies of emotional arguments are problematic because they rely on appealing to the emotions of the audience rather than presenting relevant evidence or logical reasoning. These fallacies are considered to be fallacies of relevance because they do not directly address the issue at hand.
Instead, they attempt to persuade using emotions and personal feelings. For example, an appeal to fear or pity may be used to manipulate the audience's emotions in order to sway their opinion, without providing valid and objective support for the argument.