The narrowest and most focused claim among the given options is option D: "Schools should move away from standardized testing because tests often do more harm than good."
The narrowest and most focused claim among the given options is option D: "Schools should move away from standardized testing because tests often do more harm than good."
This claim is narrow because it focuses specifically on standardized testing in schools and its potential negative effects. It does not address other aspects of education or broader social issues.
Furthermore, this claim is focused because it identifies a specific problem with standardized testing - that it often does more harm than good. This statement highlights the potential negative consequences of relying heavily on standardized tests and suggests that schools should shift away from this practice.
To support this claim, one could provide examples of how standardized testing may lead to increased stress and pressure among students, narrow the curriculum, or fail to accurately assess students' knowledge and abilities. Additionally, research studies and expert opinions can be cited to demonstrate the potential drawbacks of standardized testing.
It is important to note that while this claim is the narrowest and most focused among the given options, other claims may also be valid depending on the context and the specific goals of the discussion.
The complete question could be
Which claim is the narrowest and most focused? A. Hydraulic fracturing is not as dangerous as people think, and natural gas is an important byproduct. B. Zoos do not provide adequate habitats for elephants, nor do orangutans thrive in captivity. C. The government should cut welfare programs; homelessness among veterans is a major problem. D. Schools should move away from standardized testing because tests often do more harm than good.