225k views
1 vote
Listed below are the numbers of unprovoked shark attacks worldwide for the last several years. Why is it that a dotplot of these data would not be very effective in helping us understand the​ data? Which of the following graphs would be most effective for these​ data: dotplot,​ stemplot, time-series​ graph, Pareto​ chart, pie​ chart, frequency​ poly

User Quangkid
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

1 vote

A dotplot might not be very effective in helping us understand the data due to the following reason The data set is too small for a dotplot to reveal important characteristics of the data correct option is c.

Regarding the most effective graph for representing the given data are

A dotplot would be most effective, since it is important to be able to recreate the original list of values correct answer is e.

A dotplot might not effectively illustrate the data due to its small size, limiting the visual representation of patterns or distribution. With only ten data points, a dotplot might appear crowded or fail to reveal meaningful trends due to the small range of values.

However, for this dataset, a dotplot remains the most effective choice. Its simplicity and focus on individual values make it suitable. A dotplot allows precise depiction of each value's occurrence and relative positioning, crucial for understanding the specific occurrences of shark attacks in different years.

As the emphasis lies on representing the original data without aggregation or summarization, the dotplot excels in displaying the actual values, aiding in comprehension and analysis without distorting or simplifying the dataset.

complete the question

Listed below are the numbers of unprovoked shark attacks worldwide for the last several years. Why is it that a dotplot of these data would not be very effective in helping us understand the data? Which of the following graphs would be most effective for these data: dotplot, stemplot, time-series graph, Pareto chart, pie chart, frequency polygon?

70

54

68

82

79

83

76

73

98

81

Why is it that a dotplot of these data would not be very effective in helping us understand the data?

A. The spread of the data is very small, so it would be nearly impossible to see any differences when represented graphically.

OB. There are several duplicate values in the data and most graphical methods cannot accurately show duplicate values.

C. The data set is too small for a dotplot to reveal important characteristics of the data.

D. Even though the data are numeric, they are actually categorical data because each value is discrete.

Which of the following graphs would be most effective for these data: dotplot, stemplot, time-series graph, Pareto chart, pie chart, frequency polygon?

A. A Pareto chart would be most effective, since the data are categorical data.

B. A pie chart would be most effective, since the data are categorical data.

C. A time-series graph would be most effective, since the data are listed in order over a period of several years.

OD. A frequency polygon would be most effective, since the data are listed in order over a period of several years.

E. A dotplot would be most effective, since it is important to be able to recreate the original list of values.

User Joycelyn
by
7.4k points