Final answer:
The Bill of Rights was created to limit the government's power and protect individual rights, which is true. Conversely, the necessary and proper clause does not limit but has been used to expand government power, making the belief that it limits power false.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the Bill of Rights placed specific limits on the government to prevent it from becoming too powerful is true. Debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists highlighted concerns that a strong central government could potentially become oppressive. While the Federalists believed that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary, the Anti-Federalists felt it was essential to protect citizens' liberties. The Bill of Rights serves exactly this function by explicitly stating what the government cannot do, such as interfering with freedom of speech, press, religion, or assembly, thereby limiting the government's power and protecting individual rights.
As for the statement regarding the necessary and proper clause, it is false. The clause has not limited the power of the national government; instead, it has often been interpreted to expand federal power by allowing Congress to pass laws that are deemed necessary and proper for carrying out its enumerated powers.