Final answer:
True, a compromise often involves changing one's position to reach a mutually agreeable solution. Historically, this is seen in deliberative processes like the creation of the U.S. Constitution and in international agreements on issues like climate change, where shared goals lead to a middle ground.
Step-by-step explanation:
True, sometimes a compromise means a person has to change his or her mind. Compromise requires the ability to navigate complex issues, find common ground, and often results in parties altering their initial positions to achieve a mutually accepted outcome. This concept is well illustrated in historical contexts, such as the drafting of the U.S. Constitution where different plans, like James Madison's Virginia Plan, were introduced, requiring deliberation and negotiation among the delegates.
In government and international relations, a willingness to compromise is essential when participants have shared goals but different approaches to reaching them. For example, two countries agreeing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions might each sacrifice some of their demands to arrive at a joint commitment, reflecting the principle that 'it is better to get half a loaf of bread than none at all.' Furthermore, this attitude of compromise is often necessary in group settings, such as legislative bodies or collaboratives seeking to pass measures like the Omnibus Bill, as reflected in the historical efforts by moderates to maintain the Union.