Final answer:
True, the delegates at the Constitutional Convention recognized that mere revisions to the Articles of Confederation were insufficient and sought to draft a new Constitution, leading to debates between the Virginia and New Jersey Plans.
Step-by-step explanation:
Revision of Articles of Confederation at the Constitutional Convention
The statement is true: Delegates at the Constitutional Convention quickly realized that revising the Articles of Confederation would not be enough. Instead, they sought to create a new governmental framework. The Virginia Plan proposed a strong national government with a bicameral legislature, weighted in favor of the larger states. Conversely, the New Jersey Plan sought to amend the Articles to maintain state sovereignty, proposing a unicameral legislature with equal votes for all states, regardless of size. Both plans recognized the deficiencies of the Articles but had differing views on the structure and powers of the new government. Ultimately, the Constitutional Convention led to the drafting of a new Constitution, which established a stronger federal government while still addressing concerns over state and individual rights.