Final answer:
The question addresses the concept where the collective effort of entities is more effective than individual actions. Examples of this can be seen in game theory, biology, and physics, where combined actions result in better outcomes than separate efforts.
Step-by-step explanation:
The concept in the question pertains to the idea that the combined action of two entities is greater than the sum of their actions when taken separately. This can apply to a variety of contexts, such as economic theories where firms may gain more profit by cooperating rather than competing, or in social dynamics where a group united against a common challenge may be more effective than individuals acting alone.
A well-known illustration of this idea is found in game theory with the prisoner's dilemma, where individuals acting in self-interest may result in worse outcomes for all compared to if they had cooperated. In biology, a similar concept can be observed when examining chemical interactions, where the effectiveness of multiple molecules acting together can be significantly greater than each acting independently.
In physics, this concept can be transposed to electrical current and power in circuits, noting that both are greater in parallel connections than they would be in series.