Final answer:
Two wagon wheel companies setting prices and production levels together to boost profits exemplify collusion, a practice that could lead to legal and political challenges due to its anti-competitive nature.
Step-by-step explanation:
When two producers of wagon wheels set minimum prices and production levels to ensure higher profits, this is an example of collusion. In a typical American market economy, prices are set through negotiations between buyers and sellers. However, when companies in an oligopoly like the producers of wagon wheels collaborate, they can set prices as if they were a monopoly, which can lead to higher than competitive prices and reduced outputs. Such practices may attract legal and political pressures because they can be unfair to consumers and are usually regulated by government antitrust laws to prevent such anti-competitive behavior.
The scenario where two producers of wagon wheels set minimum prices and production levels to enhance their profits exemplifies collusion. In an American market economy, prices are typically determined through negotiations between buyers and sellers. However, in an oligopoly, where a small number of firms dominate the market, collusion can occur. In this case, companies collude to set prices collectively, emulating a monopoly's market power. This coordinated effort often results in elevated prices and reduced outputs, disadvantaging consumers. To prevent such anti-competitive behavior, government antitrust laws regulate and monitor these practices, as collusion undermines the principles of fair competition and can lead to market distortions. Legal and political pressures are common consequences for firms engaged in collusion, emphasizing the importance of maintaining competitive markets for consumer welfare.